Sobre AutoCAD Architecture
precios de AutoCAD Architecture
La versión de pago de AutoCAD Architecture está disponible a partir de USD 1,288.00.
Alternativas a AutoCAD Architecture
Reseñas de AutoCAD Architecture
Evaluación de función
- Sector: Diseño
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Usado Semanalmente en 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
AutoCAD Architecture Review
I am a self taught CAD operator who designs small houses and AutoCAD helped me a lot and is still helping me to this day even though I am still learning more, it is a good software that really helped me.
Puntos a favor
AutoCad is a very good CAD software because it is user friendly and it delivers quality graphics that encourage creativity, and it has a lot of features that can be added on and manipulated, which makes it a perfect Draughting tool for Architects old and new.
Puntos en contra
It took me too long to get a hang of everything, but truth be told, whatever I learned stayed with me because it was easy to apply, I feel it has a lot of features that need to be learnt first before everything is clearer.
- Sector: Arquitectura y planificación
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Usado A diario en Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
AutoCAD Architecture Review
Overall experience is positive and allows us to be competitive in the marketplace
Puntos a favor
The software is highly compatible with many other products. There are unending resources available and supported by most if not all industries in one form or another which makes our job easier.
Puntos en contra
Can be cumbersome at times and has glitches that require work arounds. There are times where the program freezes up and requires reboot.
- Sector: Arquitectura y planificación
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Usado A diario en Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
The Best Application for architect
this application is very powerfull to use on worksheet of architecture project, beacuse there are such good feature to make the plan much better than the other one.
Puntos a favor
i mostly like this software because this software help me to plan project model percision and detail and it provided the best graphic results.
Puntos en contra
there is no bar command which guide the user to modeling the project, the new user also need more guidden button to guide them.
- Sector: Construcción
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Usado A diario en Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Way too overpriced also not compatable with older versions
Too many clients need to have you save it down to a previous version. It is harder to customize than the older versions of CAD or Autocad alternatives.
Puntos a favor
The only pros about it is that everyone uses it so it can be used to open drawings from other firms.
Puntos en contra
It is not fully compatible with free-cad or Draftsight applications, it will give an error message saying the file was not created by an Autocad application even though there is nothing wrong with it and the file opens fine after closing the warning box. The biggest problem is sending files to people with earlier versions of CAD, they make it where you have to either buy a new copy of Autocad each year or the people sending the file have to save it down to your Autocad version. They have also eliminated or made it difficult to have auto-cad classic view instead of the ribbon. The new Xref manager is horrible unless you remember to type xrefclassic. The newest versions are also slow even on the newest PCs with core i7 processors and higher amounts of RAM.
- Sector: Arquitectura y planificación
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Usado A diario en Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Still Relevant!!
I've been a fan of the software for close to 2 decades. I still prefer it over Revit, etc, because it is so customizable. I care a great deal about the quality of my drawings - Revit gets me kind of there, but I still greatly prefer AutoCAD for it's options for lineweights, text, etc. It's not for everyone, but it's definitely for me. :)
Puntos a favor
The architecture world is making a migration from 2D to 3D BIM software - Revit, Rhino, Sketchup, and the like. For large projects, Revit may be appropriate. For modelers, Rhino. And for hobbyists, Sketchup. But there is a large market for residential/light commercial where AutoCAD is still the #1 software for working drawings. It has flexibility, and is still the preferred software for structural engineers, mechanical engineers, landscape architects, and more. I love the control I have over lineweight and clarity, as opposed to the competition.
Puntos en contra
The discrepancy between scales, and modelspace vs paperspace has been an issue in the entirety of the 18+ years I've been using the software. I have my workarounds for this, but I really wish it were easier/more intuitive to flip between MS and PS.
